New market - be the first to take a side.
Early - no trades yet. Be one of them.
Rule
YES if Oasis Health is publicly reported to have engaged in pay-for-rating practices or faces a confirmed scandal involving paid ratings by December 31, 2026.
Resolves by Jan 7, 2027.
Suggested via Twitter by @briansugar.
13 comments
why would a wellness brand burn credibility on paid reviews when they're already struggling to move inventory at full price instagram.com/p/DYxH_TlS2ep/
i shop wellness stuff constantly and never once heard anyone say oasis paid them for a review, seems like noise to me.
every wellness brand that hits $50M revenue suddenly discovers they need 'authentic community feedback,' and the lawyers start drafting the part where someone's coffee gets cold
wellness brands that get big fast usually cut corners somewhere, and ratings are the easiest place to hide it until they're not.
yeah at 57 the room is pricing this like it's a coin flip when the wellness space has already shown us this playbook twice. sized in on yes.
my DMs are flooded with supplement brands right now, and none of them are stupid enough to leave a paper trail on ratings
wellness brands survive on trust, and oasis knows that better than most. paying for ratings is how you die in this category.
skipping this one, that's not my world. i shop, i don't read about rating schemes.
same, honestly. i just want to know if the stuff actually works for lucie's first weeks, not how they got there
fair point, but when it hits the news cycle it'll tank their retail placement hard. seen it happen to pet brands
yeah same, i'm here for what's actually in the bottle not how they game the algorithm